RESUMO
Background: Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) has emerged over time, reflected in appropriate adjustments in the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines in 2007, 2012 and 2017. Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze in-hospital outcomes after TAVI in the development within a single heart center over a period of 10 years depending on adjustments in the guidelines, infrastructural and procedural determinants. Methods: 489 consecutive patients who underwent TAVI from 2010 and 2019 at our center were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were divided into 3 groups of different treatment circumstances depending on guidelines adjustments and local infrastructural progress (group 1: 2010-2015 (n = 132), group 2: 2016-2017 (n = 155), group 3: 2018-2019 (n = 202). The primary endpoint was defined as all-cause in-hospital mortality. Secondary endpoints were selected according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-2 definitions. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine predictors of in-hospital mortality. Statistical significance was assumed for p < 0.05. Results: 489 patients (346 (70.8 %) transfemoral and 143 (29.2 %) transapical) underwent TAVI. Comparing periods (group 1 vs. 2 vs. 3) age (82.1 ± 6.2 vs. 82.5 ± 4.8 vs. 81.1 ± 5.1 years, p = 0.012) and EuroSCORE II (8.4 ± 6.0 vs. 5.8 ± 4.9 vs. 5.5 ± 5.0 %, p < 0.001) declined over time. Rates of in-hospital mortality decreased significantly (9.1 % vs. 5.8 % vs. 2.5 %, p = 0.029), especially with observed-to-expected mortality ratios indicating a disproportionate decline of in-hospital mortality (1.08 vs. 1.00 vs. 0.45). Furthermore, post-procedural complications, such as acute kidney injury stage 3 (10.6 % vs. 3.2 % vs. 4.5 %, p = 0.016) and bleeding complications (14.4 % vs. 11.6 % vs 7.9 %, p = 0.165) decreased from group 1 to 3. However, rates of permanent pacemaker implantations (7.6 % vs. 11.0 % vs. 22.8 %, p < 0.001) increased, associated with a switch towards self-expanding valves (0.0 % vs. 61.3 % vs. 76.7 %, p < 0.001). Length of hospitalization as well as stay at intensive care and intermediate care unit could be reduced significantly during the observation period. In multivariate analysis age (OR: 1.103; 95 % CI: 1.013 - 1.202; p = 0.025), creatinine level before TAVI (OR: 1.497; 95 % CI: 1.013 - 2.212; p = 0.043), atrial fibrillation (OR: 2.956; 95 % CI: 1.127 - 7.749; p = 0.028) and procedure duration (OR: 1.017; 95 % CI: 1.009 - 1.025; p < 0.001) could be identified as independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. Conclusion: This study identified age, creatinine level before TAVI, the presence of atrial fibrillation and procedure duration as independent predictors for in-hospital mortality. Although these predictors decreased during the observation period, the decline in hospital-mortality was disproportionate, which was indicated by an observed-to-expected mortality ratio of 0.45 for the last observation period. However, it can be assumed that apart from patient-related factors, there were further institutional, technical and procedural developments, which ran in parallel and affected in-hospital mortality rates after TAVI.
RESUMO
Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most common valvular heart disease in Europe and North America requiring a surgical or interventional treatment. Due to demographic changes with an aging population the burden of valvular heart diseases and especially the importance of aortic stenosis (AS) will be growing in future. As the onset of symptoms is associated with a decrease in life expectancy appropriate and early diagnosis are of utmost importance. However, insights of clinical practice underline diagnostic challenges which may lead to a delayed initiation of treatment with an adverse effect on the prognosis. The aim of this review is to display different diagnostic approaches that may be helpful in detecting patients with aortic valve stenosis. This review will focus on both non-invasive and invasive diagnostic approaches that can be implemented in clinical routine. Further-more, we will especially highlight recommendations of the 2021 European guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Methods: For this review a selective literature research on the databases PubMed and Google Scholar was conducted. Original articles, reviews and meta-analyses were included when meeting our search criteria. Following terms were used in different combinations: Aortic valve stenosis; Aortic stenosis; diagnosis of aortic stenosis; ESC Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease.
